{"id":13881,"date":"2015-06-03T16:20:32","date_gmt":"2015-06-03T20:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.atlantictraining.com\/blog\/?p=13881"},"modified":"2024-05-19T01:32:41","modified_gmt":"2024-05-19T01:32:41","slug":"online-vs-classroom-safety-training","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.atlantictraining.com\/blog\/online-vs-classroom-safety-training\/","title":{"rendered":"Online Safety Training vs. Classroom Safety Training"},"content":{"rendered":"
Is online safety training really as effective as classroom safety training? In this article, we’ll answer this question using the latest available research.<\/span><\/p>\n Although the science is not settled on this subject, the vast majority of studies have fallen into these two categories:<\/p>\n No statistically detectable difference was found between the efficacy of classroom training and online training.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Online Training<\/a> was slightly more effective.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Surprisingly, very few studies find that classroom training is more effective. This directly contradicts the belief held by most safety professionals that classroom training is superior.<\/p>\n Studies indicate that online training is equivalent to classroom training but only if the course content among both formats is the same. If you conduct an engaging safety training class that is customized to your workers specific safety hazards, that will almost certainly be more effective than a generic online training course. These studies can only tell us how effective these formats are when the content is identical. If you were to record an in-person training class and convert it into an online training course, you would likely achieve the same training outcome as with the in-person training session.<\/p>\n A\u00a0study by the American Journal of Public Health showed that engagement is a significant indicator in determining the effectiveness of training. The more active participation that a medium requires, the more that the trainees will learn from it.<\/p>\n The most effective form of training evaluated in this study was behavior modeling, which is a hands-on training method that starts with the trainer demonstrating a specific task. The trainee then imitates that task while the trainer guides them through the process. While this training method is the most effective, it is also the most costly to administer.<\/p>\n This study also found that \u2018programmed instruction\u2019 (e.g lectures) were less effective than the online training equivalent. If you\u2019re going to take the time to conduct a classroom training session, It\u2019s critical that you ask challenging questions often in order to keep the employees engaged. Otherwise, your employees would have been better served with a generic online training module.<\/p>\n Another study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that more engaging training was superior when the hazard exposure severity was high but its effectiveness was equivalent to less engaging forms of training when the hazard severity was low. This means that it might make sense to use less expensive forms of training like online training for lower risk hazards, and hands-on training for higher risk hazards.<\/p>\n There are many different types of online training platforms and their efficacy varies widely based on features and content formats. Some online training platforms are nothing more than glorified powerpoints that display a series of slides with a set of navigational arrows as the user interface. For best results, look for online training courses that incorporate videos as well as \u2018learning checks\u2019 throughout the course for maximum employee engagement. All of the safety courses that we offer<\/a>\u00a0meet this criteria and were created with an emphasis on interactivity.<\/p>\n As with Online Training, the quality of classroom training varies considerably. A class conducted by someone with no passion or interest in safety that uses a PowerPoint he\/she grabbed from the internet is probably going to be inferior to an online training module. This type of trainer generally puts little or no effort into engaging the students, and passes out a simple \u2018True\/False\u2019 quiz at the end of the session.<\/p>\n Conversely, a class conducted by a safety professional that took the time to observe the workers and prepare a training session that addresses specific high-risk behaviors is going to be far more effective than a generic online training module.<\/p>\n Although most topics can be successfully taught in an online training environment, some topics just aren\u2019t conducive to this format. For example, anything involving the operation of specialized equipment or machinery would not be a good candidate for online training. A blended learning approach that combines hands-on training with online training is recommended in this case.<\/p>\n At worst, online training is equivalent to classroom training in terms of effectiveness. It\u2019s also a LOT cheaper. Training Magazine reports that companies save between\u00a050% – 70%\u00a0when replacing instructor-led training with electronic content delivery. Since both online safety training and classroom safety training are equally effective, it makes sense to use online training when possible.<\/p>\n\n
<\/p>\nContent Quality Trumps Format<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nFocus on Engagement<\/h2>\n
<\/a>\nReserve hands-on training for high-risk hazards<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nAll Online Training is Not Created Equal<\/h2>\n
Classroom Training Is Often Inadequate<\/h2>\n
Some Topics Aren\u2019t Well Suited for Online Training<\/h2>\n
Settling the Score<\/h2>\n